Go into embedded software. You can’t do ads if there is no UI taps head.
These are all me:
I control the following bots:
Go into embedded software. You can’t do ads if there is no UI taps head.
They already are, by monetizing the content they didn’t create, and paying creators just a fraction of the revenue generated.
No, it isn’t an MVNO, but I do think it gets lower priority than their premium plans.
Remember that T-mobile gives a bottom line prices, while AT&T and Verizon add a bunch of junk fees. Be sure to check into that before you switch.
In SoCal it can get pretty bad, and I’ve been to Disneyland and other events (concerts/sports) where the phone simply doesn’t work at all. I’m on a Verizon MVNO right now that seems to be fine, but the AT&T and T-Mobile based ones both have issues around here.
The court is limited to 9 by law. He’s need a majority in the house and eliminate the filibuster to change that.
I really like photon. It is very multi-alt friendly, and I can run my own instance of it locally.
Let’s remember that a bastard who married rich that had a good deal of influence on how our government works. He definitely was making sure that he had a future.
Yeah, I’ve been working in aerospace, automotive, industrial and rail safety for over 20 years. You don’t get to say “this software does thing” and then in the safety manual say “you don’t get to trust that the software will actually do thing”.
Further, when you claim the operator as a layer of protection in your safety system, the probability of dangerous failure is a function of the time between the fault (the software doing something stupid) and the failure (crash). The shorter that time, the less safe the system is.
Here’s a clue: Musk doesn’t know anything about software safety. Their lead in autonomous technology has less to do with technical innovation and more to do with cutting corners where they can get away with it.
Attempt? That was the original intent. They still wanted aristocracy, they just wanted it to be wealth based instead of hereditary.
Thank you! Even for someone technical, that needed an ELI5.
So, the software doesn’t actually do anything, it just gives the illusion that it does. That’s sounds safe.
If you are relying on T&C as a get out of jail free card for your safety system, then it isn’t a safety system.
It is a nice break from my day job, where I am certifying software for critical systems.
sigh
Yes, so much. It drove me crazy when a car company argued “but our logs say it was the driver’s fault”. We’re arguing that your most critical software failed, and you want us to trust the logging subsystem?
The NTSC needs to be qualifying car software the same way the FAA qualifies aircraft software. We need to stop trusting the manufacturers to self police.
Along with the rest of crypto, but don’t tell them…
This is the reality of safety engineering: he will go on for days about his statistics that say it is safer to drive a Tesla, but when it is you that rolls a nat 1, suddenly they aren’t safe enough.
In Canada they definitely do - I was asked for verification on about half of my tax returns. One was a pretty big oops that I thought they might come down on me for.
In the US, I think they are much more random with what they audit.
So you are saying that he made up the part about the sub drones washing ashore. Got it.
So you are saying that the independent, well respected journalist who wrote the Biography is lying, while the demonstrably unethical billionaire is telling the truth?
The admins are asking what the threat is, and the only response so far has been “but they are evil”.