Incentives matter in any system. The incentives are perverse right now.
I created a space for people to make connections and learn from each other. I call it Grok.Town and plan to start up a Lemmy instance at that domain, but for now it’s a space on Matrix with a few rooms to chat and get to know one another. Check it out @ https://matrix.to/#/#groktown:matrix.org
Incentives matter in any system. The incentives are perverse right now.
There was a whole season of The Wire that was dedicated to the theme of news publications demanding that more be done with less as budgets were cut. Craigslist was a major factor in the trend as it cut revenue severely for local publications.
It would be great if corn got that feature
There’s a variety of maize that does fix nitrogen:
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/08/amaizeballs/567140/
There are some political and technical hurdles to adapting it more broadly to the agricultural industry.
FYI: https://lemmy.ml/c/learningrustandlemmy
Maybe @SorteKanin@feddit.dk would be interested in helping people there.
Relevant information:
GovTrack.us posted about the bill in question:
Appropriations legislation covering a bit less than half of the overall funding needs of the federal government was passed by the Senate 75-22 around dinner time on Friday 3/8. The bill was signed the next morning by the President. Even though technically Biden did so after the Friday midnight deadline, the government never shutdown for even a few hours.
The Science section of the bill contains the majority of the Science related appropriations.
GovTrack.us also provided links to summaries of the bill from The New York Times by Catie Edmondson and The American Prospect by David Dayen.
Bookmarks?
Are you talking about your saved posts?
Let’s go!
Those are “new” comments.
Furthermore, a statement from Open Collective Europe: https://opencollective.com/europe/updates/regarding-the-announcement-to-dissolve-open-collective-foundation-us
You can opt in by visiting a community on another instance that allows it.
It’s easier not to look at when you know where it’s prohibited from being posted.
Thanks for sharing your experience.
They published their reasons for methodology adjustments. But you’ve made up your mind regardless of the facts.
This is easily verified to be false.
Yet comparisons of methodologies show little difference.
CPI doesn’t include the data it includes now?
Tagging https://discuss.online/u/jgrim to pass your message along.
Mastodon sort of has this.
Have you asked for help in Lemmy Admins Chat?
Academic fraud is in no way a thing that is limited or even disproportionately prevalent in China. Perhaps the flavors of it are biased to one form or another in different cultures, but don’t mistake that for more or less fraud in that culture. Perhaps you notice more from China simply because there are simply more Chinese people in the world than any other nation behind Indian people in India.