Not a direct answer, but I highly recommend reading Outlive, by Peter Attia. It’s completely changed the way I think about these things. And it’s actually grounded in science.

When you’re a government, you need a little more process to ensure things are done well (moderation, security, …). Even something simple like that could take valuable time from quite a few people.

Sad but unfortunately fairly justified. Hard to justify spending public money on 3,500 users.

Just because it’s dangerous and not always fun doesn’t make it a “mission”. Exactly like when some rich schmuck pays 150k to climb Everest.

Can we stop calling it a “mission”? This is an expensive vacation for billionaires, not a scientific endeavor.

I use World Poker. Not FOSS, unfortunately.

How do you explain that amyloid-targetting therapies are seeing some success, even if limited?

So, what’s next? A coalition of pro-europe parties? Along which line? I’m mostly interested in what we can expect in terms of environmental policy. I fear a step back…

WHAT? Where is the next one planned to take place?

Another example of a multi-billion dollar company that doesn’t curate their products/services. Costs too much money they would only profit 234 billion instead of 244 billion.

In the long term it’s a terrible strategy. People will lose confidence and stop shopping there. I’ve almost stopped and I know I’m not the only one.

Not that most executives care about long term…

Still much more complex than PET conceptually, and much more versatile.

Just wait until you find out about MRI :)

we found that tropical forests can withstand up to a 3.9 ± 0.5 °C increase in air temperatures before a potential tipping point in metabolic function

Not that close, fortunately. There are tons of other terrible disasters that will strike before we reach this point.

Tomato juice, maybe?

One day here and there, sure. Going to another place to work for a week or more? Absolutely stupid. Work is still work, and if you have to work, you might as well work in the best conditions, not on some small screen that you can barely see because of the sun.

I don’t understand why they don’t use a second model to detect falsehoods instead of trying to fix it in the original LLM?

I wonder what the impact on piracy will be? It’s probably harder to rip streaming services than it is to rip blu-rays…

As an AI model, I cannot answer duplicate questions. Please check this completely unrelated question instead.

I’m not equating guns to phones. I’m showing that the argument about “digital education” holds no water.

So, should guns be allowed in schools, along with “good gun education”?

Smartphones serve no real purpose in school. Why allow this very problematic device that is not conducive to learning and tends to cause problems outside the class, too?