Baphomephit. It. ΘΔ&. b '84. Gen. Sec. of Antifa ☭ Gnostic Mystic. Absolute Mad-Lass.

Come throw 🔥 at me: https://t.me/jazzposting Check out my BBS: lunarpunk.town

  • 0 Posts
  • 5 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle
  • OH WOW! That’s such a weird coincidence! Imagine the odds of that! /s

    Of course they did. The thing is the way the law is written violates the Constitution by promoting an ideologically-loaded, outdated translation of the Bible used by more socially extreme groups.

    • NRSV(UE) is the gold standard nowadays.
    • Leather cover? Why? What’s the point?
    • The Founding Documents to the United States do not belong in a Bible. Not everything has to be tarnished with crass “Patriotic” grift.
    • Just the Bill of Rights? The Amendments to the Constitution are legally part of the Constitution. What are they not included? Is there something in those Amendments they don’t feel is appropriate?
    • This Bible has consistent poor reviews on Youtube. A number of Bible collectors, theologians, pastors, etc have panned this book for being cheaply and poorly made. It has poor print quality, it’s pages stick together, are thin, and rip easy.

    It should be obvious to anyone this is an ideological grift and it is criminal graft too. These criminals need to be thrown in prison for this.





  • Rothbard is the reason we associate Libertarianism with the Right. He’s the one that suggested calling themselves Libertarians and Anarcho-Capitalists. Before him, Libertarianism was a Socialist thing and had little to do with Capitalism.

    Basically, modern Libertarians stole the term from the Left to re-brand themselves as something they weren’t and to create this guise of pretending to care about people’s liberty and freedom—which they also don’t because Rothbard supported and advised Fascists and had no problem with slavery or indentured servitude.

    The Right loves to steal and re-define terms used on the left.