Completely agree, that was just a quote ripped straight from the article. From everything I’ve heard it seems like people are having problems just running stock settings. Your best bet to absolutely avoid any damage is probably to literally shut your system down until the patches are available.
What, if anything, can customers do to slow or stop degradation ahead of the microcode update?
Intel recommends that users adhere to Intel Default Settings on their desktop processors, along with ensuring their BIOS is up to date. Once the microcode patch is released to Intel partners, we advise users check for the relevant BIOS updates.
Hunter vs Trump loser goes to prison lol
First they came for the Palestinians, and I did not speak out - because I was not a Palestinian.
So we’re going to stop supplying Israel with weapons, money, and international cover, right? RIGHT?
insufferable
Biden, Blinken, Kirby, and other state dept. ghouls are probably ‘very concerned’ and no doubt calling for independent investigation. Of course, they will never follow up on it, they will never pressure Israel, and said investigation will never materialize.
You wouldn’t know the players, they go to a different school.
Yes.
Bruh, how can you laugh when the illuminati is shrinking men’s taints?
I custom designed and 3D-printed a prop from an anime I like.
This is a really cool question OP. Do you have anything you want to share?
So more kids are shot where there are more lax gun laws; who could have ever foreseen that?
IMO the difference between this and paparazzi is that you aren’t legally compelled to allow the paparazzi to take photos of you. If paparazzi gets the photos then they’re theirs, but you can at least try to prevent them from taking them.
US copyright law is unsalvageably fucked
Yes
I get that the copyright is traditionally held by the photographer and not the subject. I guess the issue I have with it is how Trump (or anyone charged with a crime) is legally compelled to allow it to be created.
Also, if we assume Fulton County Jail owns the copyright, could they sell mugshot merch? If yes, that’s horrifically dystopian. If no, are they entitled to claw back any money made from the sale of mugshot merch?
Personally, I would like to live in the world where jails can’t profit off the mugshots of their inmates.
That is not how public domain works, and the article contends that the copyright is owned by the law enforcement agency that took the mugshot. If the photo was public domain it would be free for anyone to use as they see fit.
deleted by creator
You hate to defend Trump, but that’s absolutely fucked. As far as I know you can’t refuse a mugshot, so you’re essentially compelled to release the rights to your likeness if you’re charged with a crime. I could see the logic if you’re convicted (under the 13th, which is still fucked), but that’s crazy before a trial/guilty verdict.
Anyway, just a layman’s take. Would love to hear what an actual lawyer has to say.
Almost like the goal isn’t taking out Hamas leadership. Hmmm…