I feel like there are 2 related arguments against this. One is that it could motivate political prosecution to disenfranchise people. The second is that it kind of creates a slippery slope, if treason disenfranchises you why not murder, or rape, or election fraud or whatever other crime someone considers serious enough
Correction. English children will be taught this. Education is a devolved matter in the UK so this will not apply to the other parts of the UK
We do. It’s called the Equality Act 2010. It requires reasonable adjustments for disabled people. However, this is not always provided for in reality. The equality act is mentioned in the original article
I wouldn’t really call the Labour party progressive
Coffee. There are a couple of Lemmy communities but none of them are that active. Reddit had r/coffee and r/espresso that were both fairly active
Even better. The countdown resets if you look away
Discrimination based on gender identity is basically saying I have been treated differently due to being transgender. She is saying that she as a transgender woman is being treated differently to a cisgender woman. Or that is at least how it works in the UK. I would presume Australia is similar
This case is being heard in Sydney, Australia not the US so a case from the US is not relevant in determining the outcome
There is technically an unwinnable sts seed
It’s specifically for gender identity clinics so only applies to trans kids
Elan.school is a webcomic of the author’s experience at Elan. Well worth a read and the author is currently in the process of making it into a physical comic
This is a webpage from a guy who voluntarily because stateless. https://identityunknown.org/3e7/Introduction_A_series_of_life_experiences_by_Glen_Lee_Roberts_before_and_after_he_became_Voluntarily_Stateless
Tim Eicke, the UK judge at the ECtHR. He gave a talk at my university and I briefly spoke to him afterwards
Close the sky is an amazing phrase to be able to use