I don’t think she was blaming her choice on the holy spirit (whatever the hell that is), she was just saying it approved her choices and thus she did nothing wrong.
I don’t think she was blaming her choice on the holy spirit (whatever the hell that is), she was just saying it approved her choices and thus she did nothing wrong.
Yeah, this seems more to do with the content available on tiktok (like pro-gay messaging) rather than anything else. They want it banned so they can create a little fundie safe space. It’s the same reason they want to ban any books from libraries with even a hint of pro-lgbt content.
but I think history shows us that the alternative is worse.
Like, when? What are some examples? Back up your bullshit.
deleted by creator
She didn’t even have the same job titles as the people she was comparing herself against.
Foltz also claims that SpaceX uses different job titles for the same position as a way to pay women and minorities less than their white or male counterparts
That is literally covered in the exact part of the article that you quoted. Jesus fuckign Christ.
These are unlabeled ads presented as legit tweets. Are the ads on the article disguised as news content?
Yeah, but this guy only usually gets adoring tik tok fans and puff pieces in the media. This is the first time an established art magazine reviewed his work and it obviously pissed him off that this was criticism he and his ad agency had no control over. He should just enjoy his success instead of worrying about the art establishment, because he’s a viral sensation, not a critical darling. He’ll always be a Thomas Kinkade, never a Basquiat. And there’s not really anything wrong with that.