Admiral Patrick

I’m surprisingly level-headed for being a walking knot of anxiety.

Ask me anything.

I also develop Tesseract UI for Lemmy/Sublinks

Avatar by @SatyrSack@feddit.org

  • 186 Posts
  • 2.37K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 6th, 2023

help-circle
  • On your home instance: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/#70-advertising

    7.0 Advertising

    Lemmy.world is a free service, funded by donations and run by volunteers for the benefit of its users. As such, it is not intended to be used as a marketing channel for extensive commercial advertising or product promotion. Promoting or recommending products and services is generally allowed provided that the following criteria are met:

    1. It is relevant to the community where it is posted.
    2. It offers something of value to our users.
    3. It is created for community engagement rather than being a one-way message directed at users.

    Users or communities which primarily promote paid products or services, with little other engagement on Lemmy, may have their content removed and may be banned. This includes personal promotion such as a GoFundMe drive, OnlyFans page, or blog.

    I can only speak for my own (non-Lemmy.World) instance, but I do not allow any kind of fundraising campaigns. They’re too difficult to verify they’re not fraud, and allowing any just opens the floodgates to having to verify each one.


  • My counter for “they took our jerbz!” is “No one stole your job from you. Your boss gave it away.” It’s been surprisingly effective even in my very red state. Unfortunately, it seems to be a one-off as it only shuts them up and doesn’t seem to affect anything beyond that.

    Still, it shuts them up (even if it’s more like hitting the snooze button lol).

    Edit/Addition:

    Sample Conversation

    Them: Rabble rabble, immigrants taking jobs from real Americans.

    Me: (Express concern) Has that happened to you or someone you know?

    (This could go either way, but my response is basically the same)

    Them: Well, not me, but my [friend of a friend’s brother’s step dad] lost his job to some DEI immigrant.

    Them (alternate): No, but you know it happens.

    Me: Did an immigrant come up to you/them with a gun and demand that you give them your job?

    Them: …well, no, but…

    Me: Then the immigrant did not steal your job - your boss gave it away to them because they thought it would save the company money.


    Adapt as necessary.


  • Two bullet points toward the end of the article:

    • Trump’s handling of immigration polls well in public surveys.
    • But sending immigrants to El Salvador’s prison without criminal convictions or due process does not — about 60% were opposed in a recent YouGov survey.

    The only conclusion is that the first group has absolutely no idea what’s happening. That, or the “surveys” were those bad faith, heavily tilted surveys that my Republican House rep would send out:







  • I don’t see what people’s problem with this is. It’s not like it’s anyone can just buy a blue check (unlike X). It’s just confirming that the account belongs to who it claims to be (like old Twitter verified users). I don’t know if that requires any payment, but it’s definitely not “Here’s $5 – okay, here’s your blue check”.

    • During this initial phase, Bluesky is not accepting direct applications for verification," the company said.
    • “As this feature stabilizes, we’ll launch a request form for notable and authentic accounts interested in becoming verified or becoming trusted verifiers.”

    If I remember correctly, that’s pretty much exactly how old Twitter rolled out its original user verification.

    From a de-centralized perspective, I’m not sure how that would work. I guess each instance would be in charge of verification and setting the “verified” flag for the account? The alternative would be some kind of central authority. Granted, I know little of Bluesky (microblogging is not my cup of tea), so I may be way off on my guesses there.