influence exists whether they want it to or not.
influence exists whether they want it to or not.
Hard disagree. Safe C++ code can be written quite easily these days. And better tools are coming out all the time.
sftp or rsync
What are the privacy implications of adopting RCS?
When it first came out, I specifically remember that trying to turn it on in the messages app makes you agree to hand over all your messages to google, so I never used it. But now it just seems to support it anyways, so not sure what happened to the agreement I never clicked on.
Vivaldi is proprietary, FYI.
same way on all platforms
too bad navigator.platform
still returns Linux instead of Windows…
When you say “app” do you mean something that will let you view remotely through a residential NAT connection with no port forwarding or hole punching? Because 99.9% of those options are inherently not private.
If you only need the camera itself to have a local feed i.e. you already have some kind of VPN/tunnel/etc. into your home network, then something like a cheap Amcrest works fine and does not require Internet access for the camera itself.
No, there is no way to prevent sites from uploading the info besides just not providing it in the first place.
And because of how programming languages work, there’s no way for the browser to identify that data being uploaded “is” anything specific, especially when there’s things like encryption, obfuscation or just re-arranging the data itself into larger collections of data.
I was more concerned with government ties.
Removed by mod
since you crawled under a rock /s
what privacy lol, it’s already gone
dat bj tho
A new recall every two months is probably a world record.
then you haven’t tried many lol
bing bing wahoo moment
rust isn’t a magic bullet either, it still doesn’t protect against a whole host of problems, like stack overflows, out of memory/bitflips, logic errors, memory leaks, unrecoverable errors/panics etc., and many projects are full of unsafe context rust code anyways.