oh no!! good thing that doesn’t impact anything
oh no!! good thing that doesn’t impact anything
“they” uses the same number of characters as “s/he” and flows more naturally
it’s had offline navigation for years now
google maps can do that too though
try a factor of 100
I was referring to the fair in your hypothetical smartass
as if random civilians with guns wouldn’t bumble around more and also shoot the crowd?
metal detectors? pretty easy since it’s a ticketed event
a very fine line to tread indeed
how is a concern about upending precedent a nonsensical statement? the source of an argument does not impact its validity as a point
but it functions as a whataboutism. it doesn’t address the original concerns of the statement. instead it uses an ad hominem attach to discredit the argument
but it functions as a whataboutism. it doesn’t address the original concerns of the statement. instead it uses an ad hominem attach to discredit the argument
not saying you’re wrong, but that is a whataboutism
I meant that both only exist due to the labor of individuals. without the workforce, billionaires and corporations would not exist
arguably billionaires and corporations are still people-powered
edit: as in the wealth of billionaires and corporations only exists due to the exploration of the labor of the people. without that labor, billionaires wouldn’t exist
no true scotsman fallacy
why not?
can confirm
👍