The wikipedia page for Tharman Shanmugaratnam, new president for singapore, currently has a photo of a dick . How was this allowed? Why?
They allow you to fix it. You didn’t. Now it’s your fault.
Why do you allow it?
That got reverted in 9 minutes. OP is trolling to get more eyeballs on their own vandalism.
deleted by creator
There’s a Wikipedia page for that: Vandalism on Wikipedia. The short answer is that they don’t allow it, it’s done by malicious editors and it’s something they have been combating since its inception.
yeah bro i saw the pic and i was like what the fuck lmao
So fix it already.
Well, you could have reverted it and didn’t.
It obviously isn’t allowed. Just because you saw it doesn’t mean that it was allowed? Do you see someone breaking the law and think that the crime they committed is now legal?
I meant like, why doesn’t Wikipedia have a filter to detect stuff like that, obv it isn’t allowed
because there is no “hot dog detection AI” out yet. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACmydtFDTGs
Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=ACmydtFDTGs
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I’m open-source, check me out at GitHub.
It was mainly a joke but also Wikipedia allows for lewd images under certain topics like breasts or penis. Additionally they already have some level of bots that will check your changes and flash them for either immediate revert or human review. I don’t know if they have private detectors.
It’s even worse than that. There is a politician in my country that also happens to be a oligarch, a media mogul and has ties with the local mafia, but all of that is being deleted by randomly generated accounts with weird names. I’ve seen Wikipedia moderators and longtime editors get in arguments with these accounts because these points, mentioned in the controversies section are undoubtedly true and as such, belong there.
