I am trying to set up a reverse proxy server, with TLS passthrough.

I am behind CGNAT, so I cannot forward any ports from my home server. So, my current workaround was that I connected my home server to a VPS via WireGuard and used Nginx Proxy Manager (NPM) to proxy services running on different docker containers to the VPS, so that they are accessible publicly. But now I want to use TLS passthrough for better privacy. But I cannot find any guides for my case.

I need help with 2 issues, basically. Let’s take a look at my passthrough.conf file, which I have included in nginx.conf file.

stream {
    # Listen for incoming TLS connections on service1.domain.me
    server {
        listen 443;
        proxy_pass service1.domain.me;
        proxy_ssl on;
        proxy_ssl_protocols TLSv1.2 TLSv1.3;
        proxy_ssl_name $ssl_preread_server_name;
    }

    # Listen for incoming TLS connections on service2.domain.me
#    server {
#        listen 443;
#        proxy_pass service2.domain.me;
#        proxy_ssl on;
#        proxy_ssl_protocols TLSv1.2 TLSv1.3;
#        proxy_ssl_name $ssl_preread_server_name;
#    }

    # Define the backend server for service1.domain.me
    upstream service1.domain.me {
        server homeserverIP:port;
    }

    # Define the backend server for service2.domain.me
#    upstream service2.domain.me {
#        server homeserverIP:port;
#    }
}

The services are running in docker containers on different ports. When I used two server blocks and two upstream blocks, I got this error while testing NGINX config: nginx: [emerg] duplicate "0.0.0.0:443" address and port pair in /etc/nginx/passthrough.conf:13. So, I commented out the other server block and tested it again. The test was successful, but NGINX failed to restart. When I checked the systemctl status I saw: nginx[2480644]: nginx: [emerg] bind() to 0.0.0.0:443 failed (98: Address already in use). This is because I am already hosting multiple WordPress sites on this VPS.

Here’s my nginx.conf file:

user www-data;
worker_processes auto;
pid /run/nginx.pid;
include /etc/nginx/modules-enabled/*.conf;

events {
        worker_connections 768;
}

http {

        sendfile on;
        tcp_nopush on;
        types_hash_max_size 2048;

        include /etc/nginx/mime.types;
        default_type application/octet-stream;


        ssl_protocols TLSv1 TLSv1.1 TLSv1.2 TLSv1.3; # Dropping SSLv3, ref: POODLE
        ssl_prefer_server_ciphers on;

        access_log /var/log/nginx/access.log;
        error_log /var/log/nginx/error.log;

        gzip on;

        gzip_vary on;
        gzip_proxied any;
        gzip_types text/plain text/css application/json application/javascript text/xml application/xml application/xml+rss text/javascript;

        include /etc/nginx/conf.d/*.conf;
        include /etc/nginx/sites-enabled/*;

        client_max_body_size 100M;
        server_tokens off;

}

#include /etc/nginx/passthrough.conf;

I do not know much about NGINX configuration, any help or article links would help.

  • SheeEttin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Only one service can bind to each address-port pair, as the message suggests. Either pick a different one, or use nginx to proxy the wordpress service too.

    • nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This looks like a really great tool, but I cannot seem to find TLS pass through options in here. Or maybe I am too dumb to understand. I do not want the proxy server to generate or keep any certificates, all that will be done by my home server. All I want the proxy server to do is pass through the TCP connection.

        • nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Thanks. So, I just have to put this stream block in my nginx.conf file and everything will work? Do I still have to use reverse proxy for my existing WordPress sites? Or can they stay normally configured?

          • towerful@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            If they are running on the same server as nginx, then they will need to be proxied as well.
            Only 1 service can bind to a port. So if the webserver doing wordpress is bound to 80/443, nginx will not be able to acquire the port.
            Hence why reverse proxying. Nginx binds 80/443, then forwards to other services on arbitrary ports

  • Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyzB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:

    Fewer Letters More Letters
    CGNAT Carrier-Grade NAT
    HTTP Hypertext Transfer Protocol, the Web
    HTTPS HTTP over SSL
    IP Internet Protocol
    NAT Network Address Translation
    SSL Secure Sockets Layer, for transparent encryption
    TCP Transmission Control Protocol, most often over IP
    TLS Transport Layer Security, supersedes SSL
    VPN Virtual Private Network
    VPS Virtual Private Server (opposed to shared hosting)
    nginx Popular HTTP server

    [Thread #135 for this sub, first seen 12th Sep 2023, 10:35] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

  • qjammer@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am running a similar setup to yours. The issue is that only one server block can listen to an address+port pair. You ought to do something like this:

    map $ssl_preread_server_name $proxy_backend_router {
            serviceA.example.com    upstreamA:12346;
            serviceB.example.com    upstreamB:12346;
            default $ssl_preread_server_name.invalid_proxy:443;
    }
    
    
    server {
            listen 443;
            ssl_preread on;
            proxy_pass $proxy_backend_router;
    }
    
  • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Hi OP,

    I don’t know how to do TLS pass-through, but I think you could just run NAT (configure the firewall on your VPS) and host your reverse proxy at home. No need for TLS pass-through in such a case, unless you absolutely need to host the proxy on the VPS.

    Cheers

    • nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I am not sure how to do that. Can you, please, link a guide or any documentation? Does this method prevent the VPS provider from looking into the data being passed through?

      • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t have any guide (haven’t looked for one). The concept is simple:

        1. Configure Wireguard server on the VPS.
        2. Connect to server using your router/home firewall as a client (I believe you’ve done this already).
        3. Configure nftables or iptables to forward traffic coming from a certain IP/port through your VPN connection to your router.
        4. Since you have hosted your proxy at home, that’s where TLS termination happens, which means your traffic is encrypted in transit (NAT does not decrypt packets). So yes, you’re (in theory) safe from the VPS provider.

        I believe there are ways to encrypt one’s RAM on a VPS but you likely don’t need it here, and that might be beyond the scope of this discussion anyway.

        Cheers. I was given this idea by another person on Lemmy, I’m just pushing this wonderful idea forward.

        • nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have configured WireGuard server on the VPS, yes. But I am not connecting to it using my router. I am just using a wg config file on my home server to connect to it. And do I configure nftables or iptables on the VPS? Because the traffic from my home server is already set to forward to the VPS using wireguard. The proxy is set up on the VPS, not home server. I cannot change any settings on my router because I am behind CGNAT.

          • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well, it doesn’t matter if you configure the wireguard client on the router or the server.

            Running your proxy at home instead of on the VPS makes it possible for you to terminate SSL at home, inside your LAN, which means no need for TLS pass-throughs.

            nftables is recommended by Debian, but I suppose either one will work just fine.

            I’m asking you to configure NAT on your VPS so as to forward traffic from the wider Internet, through your VPS into your wireguard tunnel. Obviously, I’m assuming you’re following security practices on the VPS so as to not compromise your home network. The configuration you have on your server is fine, since that’s meant for outbound traffic.

            You can absolutely run a Wireguard client on your router, regardless of whether you are behind CG-NAT or not. It’s a different story if your router doesn’t even let you run extra software on top. That’s a different conversation.

            Cheers.

    • nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is TLS termination at the Cloudflare’s backend servers, so theoretically, they can look at all the data going through.