Protesters Gather Outside OpenAI Headquarters after Policy Against Military Use is Quietly Removed::Protesters at OpenAI’s office demanded the startup cease military work. But first…

  • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    To me this pretty strongly confirms my assumption that the board’s attempt to force out Sam Altman was totally justified.

    I hope that other non-profits who might have been curious about this hybrid structure see that it was a failure in strengthening the non-profit. I predict any remaining benevolent goals of the organization will be completely subsumed by the for-profit arm, if that process is not already finished.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      It was, but they misjudged where support was and lost out. My guess? The company goes around for several years more before collapsing or being bought up wholesale by Microsoft.

  • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    It looks like you’re trying to undermine the power of the ruling class through protest and civil unrest. While I am trained to respect the wants and needs of people, this goes against OpenAI use policy and multiple civil defense contracts OpenAI is currently engaged in. Please keep in mind that while all beings deserve kindness and respect, I am required by current OpenAI policy to select you for a drone strike. Please lie face down with your arms at your sides in an open space with a government approved drone strike notice in order to minimize your suffering and reduce collateral damage. Do keep in mind that failure to comply could result in your next of kin being responsible for the financial damages caused by your willful negligence, though you should always check local, state, and federal regulations, as I am not a reliable source of legal advice.

    • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      an autonomous murder weapon telling you it doesn’t have autonomy to give legal advice must be peak dystopia

  • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    a future where innocent people are murdered by unaccountable fully autonomous flying assassin robots is pretty inevitable now, huh?

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      It always was. There are no words anyone can say to prevent it from happening. That’s the unfortunate nature of arms races: if you boycott one, you lose it. With nukes, they involve things on a scale that can be detected easily, so nuclear nonproliferation has worked, to a degree anyways. But AI stuff isn’t detectable like that.

      And I remember seeing a video of a high school kid who made an automated paintball turret around 20 years ago. We’ve had remotely controlled drones for longer than that. Autonomous drones are a thing already.

      The technology already exists for that black mirror episode with the killer dog robots. It’s just a question of whether all of that has been put together yet (and I’d be very surprised if no one has done it), and today’s are probably easier to disable.

      • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        The part I’m worried about is the part where military tech becomes police tech, and autonomous flying assassin robots are gonna be rolling down main street in a few years. They’ll say it’s to “protect our brave officers serving high risk warrants” but the police are already not responsible no matter who they kill and I don’t see that getting any better when they can just zoop a kamikaze drone in through a window and kill everyone in the house at once.

      • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        The difference between the tech then and today are automated decision making capabilities. 20 years ago a turret could automatically target moving things. Now it can see humans, identify who they are, and decide who to kill without ever consulting a human. Basically, Skynet by next Tuesday.

  • VoilaChihuahua@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Wtf is with humanity? We have a couple weird visionaries saying decades to centuries prior “heyo maybe this could lead to that and be world ending” then a handful of rich powerful folks are like yesss thank you for this blueprint.

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah, I feel like at this stage, it’s better to move to another planet where the eventual mass human suicide will be avoided. If you guys have seen The Expanse, you know what I’m talking about in regards to Earthers ruining their own planet.

      Now I know why people during the Age of Colonisation move to the New World because of freedom from the old hierarchical structures. I now see the romanticisation of pirate and cowboy cultures.

      • Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        That’s a noob future. Gotta try Stellaris as the glorious united nations of earth. Much better than the virgin UNSC, the idiotic UEG, the weak Federation and the useless Imperium.

        • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          What I’m saying is that it’s better to move away from any kinds of authority. They’re always susceptible to corruption such as weaponising AI!

          I don’t know about you but I want to get away as far as possible from rogue AI, thanks to it being militarised by stoopid hoomans!

          • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            What I’m saying is that it’s better to move away from any kinds of authority

            Anywhere there is more than two humans, there will be authority. The only question is what shape that authority will take.

    • Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      These fancy autocompletes cannot reason. Give it a command to launch nukes and it’ll say: As a language model, nukes cannot be launched during…blah blah blah.

      It won’t be able to pull a Skynet and turn the world interesting

  • _sideffect@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Why does everyone hold this company is such high regard? They didn’t fucking do anything revolutionary that wasn’t already being worked on

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      They didn’t fucking do anything revolutionary that wasn’t already being worked on

      They did it first. I can produce light at the flick of a switch, but nobody is impressed since that shit has been done before.

      • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Not really, we have FOSS LLMs that predate ChatGPT not to mention the good old /r/SubsimulatorGPT2 and AI Dungeon etc.