• tygerprints@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Especially now with newspapers reporting that Taylor Swift is seen as a ‘danger to Republican norms’ (per USA TODAY copy, Feb 2 - 4), this is an especially dangerous position to put her in. Republicans are starting to claim she is swaying the country away from their “values” (whatever those might be) and they are looking at her as an enemy of our country.

    So the person doing this might have innocent motives, but it could lead to horribly disastrous results, and he could also be jailed for doing this. So I’m glad she’s taking some legal action up front if only to protect herself and show that she is unwilling to be made a victim of other people’s nutjob bigotry.

    • mommykink@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      he could also be jailed for doing this

      My fucking ass lmao. It’s public information being posted on a public forum with no call to action whatsoever.

    • solrize@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      We may have reached peak Taylor now that she is making a show of dating that football player. She intrigued me for a while but now I mostly cringe.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Yeah I don’t really know anything about her except her music isn’t really my thing. I recently gave it another shot but every song felt kinda ragey and judgey in an unexpected way. It falls in this “quite literal but somehow unclear and never abstract” style of songwriting that to me is… yeah, cringey.

        • solrize@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Her music never did much for me but that’s fine, that’s just me. But I heard she was supposed to be a good lyricist. It seemed to me she had some sharp lines here and there, with filler in between. I was more interested in her persona and how she hit back against the record labels and movie studios. She did a good job of that.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Yeah. Re-recording her album after the record label fucked her over was a genius and commendable move

  • thecrotch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m thinking since the super bowl drama she’s probably getting more death threats than usual, and this is a reaction to that. It’s not going to work. You cant sue someone for publishing publicly available information.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      What does fEmInIsT have to do with anything? Was elon musk a feminist when he did this or…?

      • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        What does fEmInIsT have to do with anything?

        That’s exactly the point. She (and her legion of zombies) will cry misogyny and claim to be victim even when it isn’t true.

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              I’m guessing you have used the term “feminazi” more than a few times. Not understanding your weird issue with women is not a loss for me.

  • sebinspace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Alright you’ve been on a roll lately Swifty, but imma call you out; transponders are public information.

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Its a bit more complicated than that.

      Traffic cameras are usually publicly accessible. You are also, generally, allowed to take pictures of people when they are in public spaces where there is not an expectation of privacy.

      So at what point of this is the line crossed?

      1. Seb in space’s car was spotted driving down Main Street at 4:13 pm on Tuesday
      2. Seb in space was next seen on 1st street at 4:15 pm
      3. Seb in space was next seen turning off into the Hairy Palms apartment complex at 9:12 pm on Tuesday
      4. Seb in space was seen leaving the Hairy Palms apartment complex at 06:00 on Wednesday

      That is where this gets pretty murky. Because we all more or less acknowledge that parparazzi taking pictures of everyone leaving an airport are assholes (unless it is about figuring out if The Rock is going to come do PR to distract people from the WWE sexual slavery scandal…). But we have no issue with knowing that without even needing to send someone over to see who got off the 1235 LAX->DFW flight.

      And while my initial stance is “fuck the super-rich”: I am allegedly part of a private chat for “people in tech” to give each other a heads up if we see a CEO getting off a flight. Because if your boss is pretty regularly visiting Facebook HQ and not telling anyone? That is the sign that you need to refresh your CV because you might get layed off after an acquisition/merger. There are definitely business reasons for not making it trivial to track individuals.

      So yeah. I am going to side on the stance of “if you need to travel secretly, wear sunglasses like the rest of us”. Or, if you are too famous to even risk that, at least use one of the private jet companies rather than owning your own. But I also think this is something that we need to actually consider from a legal and privacy standpoint and it is a lot more complex than that.