• BlueLineBae@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Gabe said it best! “The easiest way to stop piracy is not by putting antipiracy technology to work. It’s by giving those people a service that’s better than what they’re receiving from the pirates.”

  • nostradiel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Wtf, how can a post in a piracy group be a link to a site that won’t let you read an article unless you subscribe or create an account…?!

    • Zuberi 👀@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      The same way I haven’t seen an ad in years, I also use a paywall bypass extension.

      So I guess it skips my mind sometimes; when none of these sites have had paywalls for years.

      I would argue a good chunk of the people here would prefer the OG link so they can archive it themselves (or make an offline .html copy directly)

  • Custoslibera@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    This has to be stopped. Just look at what Napster did to the music industry. That’s right, there used to be a music industry and now it’s just…gone. No more music, no more money to be made in music. Don’t let these evil streaming services do the same to poor defenceless Hollywood, bastion of women’s rights!

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Jokes aside, I have paid for Google’s music service since it launched (RIP Play Music), but I am a millisecond away from canceling my subscription because Google does not provide me with any way to randomize playlists. I don’t mean shuffle play. That shit is broken and always has been. It would not be a big deal if I could randomize my playlists on demand, but no.

          • Menteros@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Pure randomness isn’t great for music playlists. The algo needs to account for recency so you don’t hear the same some 6 times in a row. Technically still random but no one wants that.

            • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              That’s the difference between randomizing a playlist and shuffle play. If you randomize a playlist, the songs will never repeat unless you have them in the list twice. YouTube Music’s shuffle play often plays the same twenty songs over and over out of a playlist with over six hundred songs.

  • EfreetSK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Can someone list those piracy subscription services so we can avoid them as responsible citizens?

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Remember when they found out the dudes behind piratebay were like 3-5 hacktivist friends who made it in their free time lol?

    Also what illegal subscriptions. Do they really think people pirate content for it to be sold and not shared?

    • Aux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      People who pirate content don’t do it for free. It might be news to you, but piracy is a huge business.

      • mlg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Not for every average Hollywood movie ever.

        There’s so many acronyms for the source because of how many people independently rip, not even including cam rips.

        Now if it’s some big gun software like cobalt strike, then sure yeah people definitely charge.

        But Movie and TV pirating is so easy, people regularly make their own rips and torrents.

        • Aux@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Again, it might be news for you, but it’s a huge business with many layers. There are plenty of professional rippers and crackers who earn a living one way or another. There are plenty of underground translators and streamers. Ads, hostings, seed boxes, TV boxes, different partnerships - there’s a lot of money flowing.

          Just go to any public tracker and you will see ads. Download some subtitles and they often contain ads as well. And then you have partnerships like targeted attacks on software developers, etc. Then there are normies who are getting scammed into buying pirated content for full retail price by physical media vendors. All kinds of handy people who will install you a dish to receive pirated satellite TV “for free”.

  • Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    sparking concerns on Wall Street that the services will never be as profitable as cable once was

    Obligatory fuck Wall Street

  • ѕєχυαℓ ρσℓутσρє@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Adding to the discussion, if you want to watch anything that’s not mainstream (i.e. non-western, or arthouse), you’re basically supposed to either wait for it to stream on Mubi or get a Blu-ray/DVD (that are often out of circulation if it’s more than 5 years old). So the only real option is pirating.