• SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Removing CO2 from the atmosphere is a speculative technology at the moment.

    Like, yes, we “can” do it, if you ignore all the materials and energy needed to perform that process. And that’s just in theory, in practice its bound to be far more difficult.

    No matter how you put it, it’s easier to just… Not release the pollution in the first place. If it’s too difficult to stop polluting, it will certainly be too difficult to remove that pollution that has been already released. Entropy and all that.

    Removing CO2 from the atmosphere is something we should only really start thinking about when the world already runs nearly entirely cleanly.

    • alvvayson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You ignore political realities.

      An Apollo scale program to extract carbon emissions from the atmosphere could be financed by the OECD countries without heavily impacting their economies.

      Building a thousand nuclear plants with reduced safety requirements in a remote place would not run into NIMBY problems.

      Stopping emissions globally would require Chinese political will, since they emit more than all of the OECD combined.