• WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Luckily, we can choose to reject reality and believe whatever makes us feel better.

      I feel best believing the biosphere is gonna force humanity to “find out” for the last century of fuckin around with a recklessly unplanned terraform.

        • Striker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You can always find these people and make them find out. They are actively committing genocide against the human race.

                • very smart Idiot@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Man I am kinda sorry, that I invade your worldview.

                  But rich people don’t have all their money stored in a vault like Dagobert Duck. It’s all stocks.

                  And boy, if one of the companies make losses, then their money goes downhill. It’s volatile.

                  And due to immense concurrence in innovation in the tech sector, every investor has a huge interest in innovation.

                  And with many investment, the start of a company is ensured.

                  The current capitalism is the system that works best.

                  Especially the US capitalism is one hell of a driver in innovation. I live in Germany and many companies wouldn’t be possible here. Even though we have capitalism, it’s much softer than its US counterpart.

                  The downside of course is poverty for cheaper labour.

                  And that’s brutal, but it’s the reality we live in.

                  Though I wouldn’t want to live in the US without healthcare, on the counter side I wouldn’t want to start a company here in Europe.

            • minorsecond@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Why does it seem like there are a ton more conservatives here on Lemmy than there were on Reddit?

                • minorsecond@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I don’t know how I feel about it. On one hand, it makes for less of an echo chamber. On the other hand, their thoughts are fucking stupid and it hurts my brain to see them.

    • angrymouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      My uber driver said that global warming is actually true but have literally nothing about human influence.

      Some years ago these persons were saying that global warming was a hoax, now that only the human influence is a hoax.

      • Sjatar@sjatar.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Had a argument with a person on YouTube, he thought that increased CO2 in the atmosphere would be beneficial. It would help plants grow better!

        Also that humans was not behind it.

      • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ahhh, yes. The conservative backpedalling.

        It’s not happening. It’s happening but it’s all cyclical. It’s not cyclical this time but it’s not our fault. It’s our fault but global warming is good ackshually. Global warming is bad but there’s nothing we can do about it. We could do something about it but it’s too expensive/late. Maybe it’s not too expensive but THE CHINESE!

        • Juris_LLM@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          In stage one we say nothing is going to happen.

          Stage two, we say something may be about to happen, but we should do nothing about it.

          In stage three, we say that maybe we should do something about it, but there’s nothing we can do.

          Stage four, we say maybe there was something we could have done, but it’s too late now.

    • Pisodeuorrior@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      What I hear some acquaintances say is like “who cares, I’ll go to the beach, turn the AC on, what’s the big deal” .

      As if the floods we had in Italy this year, or the wild fires, or the storms, or the draughts, or the Alps without snow, the glaciers disappeared, the sea turned green, the invasion of jellyfish weren’t connected.

      Some people, most people, are just too fucking stupid.

  • FapFlop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I used to be subbed to /r/collapse. I see world news is covering that for me.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Recycling metals is good, especially aluminum. Recycling glass? Not bad. Recycling plastic? That is literally something the oil industry forced by having their resin codes look almost exactly like the recycling symbol. People understandingly confused the resin codes to mean it was recyclable and flooded recycling centers with plastic. So instead of throwing it in the garbage and telling people plastic is not recyclable, they did what they could to recycle it. Sorting and cleaning was a pain in the ass and made it not worth it…in the US. China was happy to accept it for a couple decades until a few years ago. Now most recycling centers only accept plastic with a reason code of 1 or 2. But people do not really check the number on the symbol. A lot of it is 5 which is not recyclable in the vast majority of places but people still toss that into recycling because they think it has the recycling symbol on it. So recycling centers have to sort that shit out and send it to the landfill. It is a massive waste of resources that the oil companies are fine with since people think they are doing their part.

      Recycling in general though was not supposed to be a fix for climate change. While recycling things like aluminum is significantly more energy efficient than mining, the bigger issue there is the mine itself.

  • HeavenAndHell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Someone at work said “If climate change is real, then why don’t rich people sell their beach properties?”

    And before you ask, yes they are a boomer.

    • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      But they actually are… Down in Miami, wealthy people are fleeing the beachfront property and buying up housing where all the poor people live, which also happens to be further from the beach. There have been a number of documentaries and news segments on this trend which you can easily find on YouTube.

      • HeavenAndHell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Oh it doesn’t matter. They’re just repeating the same old tired debunked points from other bigots that also think climate change is a scam. Nothing will ever convince these types of people.

    • Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      As European where AC are not common: Close all windows and window shutters during the day. And don’t use the oven.

    • jossbo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Thank fuck for that. Now if we can only turn off all the other a.c. as well, we’d have made a start!

      Edit: this was a joke, but wow, you Americans are really defensive about your AC. I live in the UK and the rare times it gets very hot we are miserable because our building almost never have AC, and are built to retain heat. So I do see how much more comfortable it makes you.

      Someone, who was trying to argue in favour of AC, said it uses 10% of all electricity globally. Thats insane! I guess we actually do need to turn it all off.

      • Kittenstix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Well, you can’t so celebrating one poor guy’s AC going out in a heatwave is kind of a dick move, besides, it’s not AC in it of itself that is causing global warming, i’d bet that if we ran all AC on solar we’d still be fucked.

        Also it’s businesses cooling (empty) offices that are the bulk of the % of AC watt hours used.

        • jossbo@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          One guy said it makes up for 1.5% of all the energy we use! That’s huuuuge. I was joking originally but I’m pretty convinced now.

          • Kittenstix@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’d say 1.5% is a fucking steal for the benefit it provides, if I could only have one modern convenience i’d take AC every fucking time

      • Texas_Hangover@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do you live outside? Under a liquid cooled tree? In a temperate zone? Never used electricity in your life?

  • Celivalg@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, sad thing is we are already signed up for the next 20 years, as in even if we stopped emitting everything tomorrow, we would still have +2°C in 20 years…

    And how realistic is stopping everything tomorow?

    +3°C… we would need to have a new coronavirus crisis every years, not just a new one, but stack them on top, in terms of emissions. Ofc you can’t have more then one global confinement at a time (doesn’t make sense to double confine someone) so that wouldn’t even work.

    We. Are. Fucked.

    • alvvayson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      We aren’t locked in for the next twenty years, only the next ten years.

      We could build a thousand RBMK like nuclear reactors in a decade and then suck out 50 ppm of CO2 out of the atmosphere in another decade.

      Would cost $500B to $1T or so.

      We just don’t really think global warming is serious enough to warrant an action plan at the scale of the Manhattan project, Apollo program or Messmer plan.

      • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Removing CO2 from the atmosphere is a speculative technology at the moment.

        Like, yes, we “can” do it, if you ignore all the materials and energy needed to perform that process. And that’s just in theory, in practice its bound to be far more difficult.

        No matter how you put it, it’s easier to just… Not release the pollution in the first place. If it’s too difficult to stop polluting, it will certainly be too difficult to remove that pollution that has been already released. Entropy and all that.

        Removing CO2 from the atmosphere is something we should only really start thinking about when the world already runs nearly entirely cleanly.

        • alvvayson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You ignore political realities.

          An Apollo scale program to extract carbon emissions from the atmosphere could be financed by the OECD countries without heavily impacting their economies.

          Building a thousand nuclear plants with reduced safety requirements in a remote place would not run into NIMBY problems.

          Stopping emissions globally would require Chinese political will, since they emit more than all of the OECD combined.

      • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We’re not locked in for the next 20 years. Not for the next 10.

        The carbon in the atmosphere is going to be there for the next millenium and the temperature won’t level out till the 2100s if we stopped all carbon emission right this second.

        Furthermore, if we did stop all emissions right now, the planet would get 0.5-1.5 °C hotter within a year or two due to the end of the aerosol pollution cooling effect that’s been cutting the effects of carbon induced climate change in half this whole time.

        This year is so hot because they put limitations on sulfur emissions from shipping boats in the Pacific. Those emissions were cooling the atmosphere, but the aerosol emissions (which that sulfur is one of) only last in the atmosphere for about 2 weeks before they’re rained out of the air.

        We’re fucked.

  • Knightfall@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Considering here in Winnipeg, Canada, where it reaches -35C or even colder, it was pretty wild having weeks on end of +30C to even +39C temperatures, and so soon into our summer.

    I never want to complain about the heat when we have snow for 7 months, but that was ridiculous.

    • bloopinator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The upper Midwest really has some of the worst weather in North America. Get schlonged by freezing temps and snow for 6 months followed by heat for another 6 months.

    • Danatious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I genuinely don’t understand, no disrespect intended but why do you remain there? Could you not just move south to a warmer climate? -39c just sounds uninhabitable.

      • ZC3rr0r@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I will gladly, cheerfully, trade any 39c day for a -39c day. Cold is easily manageable with more / better clothes. Even when dressed for the heat, it still saps your energy like crazy and makes you feel like shit in the process.

  • TheGoldenGod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I feel like we’re watching zombies slowly lurching towards us, but there’s people pretending it’s totally normal and nothing to worry about.

    • Spzi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      we’re watching zombies slowly lurching towards us, but there’s people pretending it’s totally normal and nothing to worry about.

      If 2020 Gave Us Zombies Instead Of A Pandemic. It was pretty depressing in realizing how easy we could solve crises, but we can’t, since some politicians prefer talking points, and too many sheep happily follow. And measures against the pandemic were just a temporary inconvenience, while the climate crisis seems to be here to stay, growing stronger every day.

      • TheGoldenGod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sad but true. Politicians in general appear to be a spineless lot, appealing only to their corporate donors.

  • bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Stupid thing is that it’s locally so cold that I had to turn the heat back on last week after having it off for two months. Just a few weeks back I had to bring the fans down from the attic to stay cool. Shit is just weird. This summer is going to be fucked. There’s also not the usual pollen or insects.

    Anyway, if you’re interested in visiting Denmark as a tourist, I can currently only recommend mid May or early September. The remaining 47 weeks of the year are “normal” 10°c and windy rain regardless of seasons.

    • ntzm [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Whataboutism, the west contributes significantly more per capita than China. Yes they should be doing more but it’s better focused elsewhere