Neuralink’s disclosure last week that tiny wires inside the brain of its first patient had pulled out of position is an issue the Elon Musk company has known about for years, according to five people familiar with the matter.

The company knew from animal testing it had conducted ahead of its U.S. approval last year that the wires might retract, removing with them the sensitive electrodes that decode brain signals, three of the sources said. Neuralink deemed the risk low enough for a redesign not to be merited, the sources added.

The company said last week that the implant’s tiny wires, which are thinner than a human hair, retracted from a patient’s brain in its first human trial, resulting in fewer electrodes that could measure brain signals.

  • TheBest@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t mean to backseat engineer, but ensuring your BRAIN INTERFACE DEVICE succsessfully connects seems pretty fucking vital and worth of a redesign. Even if its expensive. Even if the probability is low, it needs to be virtually zero.

    Its hard to take a step back and view this as regular product development that has timelines and such strictly due to the nature of the product. This is almost literally the most invasive a product can be, you better fucking nail your execution.

    The people that actually would benefit from this technology deserve better.

    • TIMMAY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      capitalism should stay the fuck away from peoples bodies, let alone the inside of their skulls

    • Coasting0942@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      you better fucking nail your execution

      Musk: it seems the public isn’t so against our proposal to extend the testing pool to death row inmates.

    • exanime@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      The people that actually would benefit from this technology deserve better.

      100% correct. The issue is that this is not the goal of those developing this technology, the goal is (checks notes), money… All they care about is money and if some disabled people suffer some more, well, that’s the price they are willing to pay to get richer

    • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      It depends on how many of the electrodes are affected.

      For instance, your phone screen is probably expected to develop dead pixels over time, but there is a big difference between expecting a handful of pixels to stop working and expecting half of them to stop working. The former has virtually no effect, whereas the latter makes the phone unusable.

      Likewise, the most important question for a brain interface is not “Are all the sensors working?”, it’s “Is the patient experiencing reduced performance?”

      • ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        Also the timeline that’s expected to happen on. I’d be pretty fucking mad if my phone had dead pixels less than 6 months after buying it. 10 years, not so much.

        Likewise, I’d be pretty mad that if a reportable amount of my brain electrodes detached within the first 6 months of having them, but I’d be less mad if it was a few years down the line (not that I’d ever be fully okay with it. This is my brain, after all).

        • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          I’d be pretty fucking mad if my phone had dead pixels less than 6 months

          That’s because screens are a mature technology. Twenty years ago, you expected one or two dead pixels in every brand new screen.

          Here’s an example of a replacement policy from those dark ages:

          The LCD display of products under warranty will be replaced if CTL determines that it has 6 or more bright sub-pixels, 6 or more dark sub-pixels or a combination of 6 or more bright and dark sub pixels.

          • ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 months ago

            It’s a lot easier to warranty a phone screen than it is brain surgery. That’s why that expectation was acceptable for screens.

            • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              By the same token, medical devices have more built-in redundancies in case of partial failure. That’s why the overall impact on the patient is more important than how many electrodes are operational.

              • ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                6 months ago

                I will admit, I think I’m coming from a place of zero trust that anything musk has his hands in has any amount of safety or redundancy built in, because that might hurt the bottom line

                • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Pretty much every medical device is made by people who are equally interested in the bottom line, they just aren’t constantly in the media spotlight like Musk.

                  Fortunately there are government agencies that closely watch these companies to make sure patient safety comes first.