I have a Steam Deck, Switch lite with grip, Anbernic 351v, and Gameboy advance (The non clamshell one) that I want to store in my drawer, but also want to keep them tidy, well displayed, and unharmed at the same time.

I was thinking to 3d print insterts/molds of the consoles that I can just slip them in and out of, and was wondering what the easiest way to accomplish that would be.

Also, I tried to upload pictures but kept getting an error.

  • papalonian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 months ago

    Someone else mentioned gridfinity, that was my first thought too. You can probably find modules for all of the things you listed already made and ready to print.

    Once you start with gridfinity, though, you will never stop.

    • TheMonkeyLord@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      I didn’t even think about the fact that there are probably some for gridfinity already. Will look into that

  • j4k3@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    Probably the best and safest method is to look into the foam used for camera bags. That is the most common customisable option I know of that is practical. You’ll spend way less time and likely money if you cut foam to fit and pack everything.

    Obviously, I’m a fan of 3d printing. Heck I’m beside my printer that is chugging away at a design I made today. However. I think it is a matter of using the right tool at the right time. IMO, big drawer filling organizers are not ideal for printing. I can make wood cardboard or sheet metal boxes much faster and cheaper than printing.

    I could see myself designing a quick 2 rail holder with slots for each device to sit within, but that is going to be sloppy and likely wear poorly on the device. Best bet in my opinion is camera bag foam. If it is good enough for a half dozen $1k pro primes in a bag that gets banged around, it will work for some hand helds.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Also, I tried to upload pictures but kept getting an error.

    If lemm.ee supports image uploads – which they don’t have to – they may have size restrictions; my understanding is that the size restriction can be customized on a per-instance basis.

    EDIT: They say in their sidebar:

    https://lemm.ee/

    • Image uploads are enabled 4 weeks after account creation
    • Image upload limit is 500kb per image

    Your account was created in 2023, so it’s not the 4 week limit, but you’re probably exceeding their (relatively low, as Lemmy instances go) image size limit.

    Be kind of interesting to expose that data and let lemmy.fediverse.observer display limits per-instance.

    EDIT2: I think that the largest image I’ve uploaded on lemmy.today is this high-resolution scan, which is 8 MB.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Well, someone’s gotta pay for all the bandwidth somehow.

        considers

        Honestly, maybe that’d be a way for instances to provide some kind of “premium” service. Like, provide larger upload limits for people who donate. I assume that the instance admins don’t have any ideological objections to larger images, just don’t want to personally pay out-of-pocket for huge bandwidth and storage bills.

        goes looking

        I believe that this is the backend used by Lemmy, pict-rs:

        https://github.com/distruss/pictrs

        https://join-lemmy.org/docs/administration/from_scratch.html

        Lemmy supports image hosting using pict-rs. We need to install a couple of dependencies for this.

        It looks like it only has one global size setting, so probably can’t do that today.

        Could also host one’s images on an off-site image hosting thing, but then you don’t benefit from integration with the uploading UI. I guess another option would be for Lemmy to provide some sort of integration with an off-site image-hosting service, so that a user could optionally use all the Lemmy features seamlessly, but just have your client or browser make use of your off-site account.

  • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    If it were me, I probably would not be able to resist the urge to make whatever inserts you develop compatible with a Gridfinity baseplate, because I am that kind of nerd.

    To create perfectly console-shaped two dimensional inserts, or at least close enough, I would start by laying each system flat on a piece of paper and tracing around it with a narrow bodied mechanical pencil. Stick this in your scanner and make an image out of it, and then trace over that image at scale in the CAD software of your choice (FreeCAD is… free). This will automatically come with a built in amount of clearance in the amount of half of the width of the body of your pencil.

    Just make a flat base with a wall sticking up maybe 2-3mm thick or more if you feel like it, to roughly half the height of each object. You can put some gaps in it if you prefer to have places to grab the item directly.

    • TheMonkeyLord@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s clever. I’ve wantef an excuse to do gridfinity stuff for a whil. Should have thought of the scanner thing lol.

      I am gonna check if there are existing modules already like another commenter suggested, but otherwise will use that paper truck