• HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    Tankie mods on world are criticized for being too tankie in moderation.

    Admins try to address this by forcing mods to argue instead of immediately ban if something is posted against their beliefs.

    A non-tankie mod thinks it is bullshit that they have to engage in every online argument in good faith and takes their subs (I know this isn’t the official term but it communicates the idea) dark in protest.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      fucking tankies are here to ruin yet another alternative social network. Every. Single. Time. Be it alt-right nuts or alt-left ruining the party for everyone.

    • john89@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      20 hours ago

      While I don’t agree with the ‘tankie’ rhetoric (it’s been thrown around so much that word has no meaning here), mod abuse has definitely gotten out of control across most online communities.

      It’s opening up an opportunity for communities that don’t tolerate mod abuse to flourish.

      The mods only have themselves to blame. Hopefully these new communities won’t repeat the same mistakes.

      • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        19 hours ago

        It is going to be a learning experience for mods and admins on Lemmy. It took years for Reddit to cobble together a governance structure and, even then, it was really bad. I haven’t seen the devs take any stance on building tools to help and we’ve seen a lot of cases where mod abuse have been defended by admins.

        This seems to be a first stab at admins taking a proactive approach to mod abuse. It is a bad policy, but at least they seem like they are trying to do something.

      • SoftTeeth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Why are right wingers the only ones who ever try to devalue the meaning of words?

        If they don’t like being called tankies or nazis they are free to chage their beleifs, same as you if you feel like you are being grouped in for your beliefs.

        • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          We’re going to allow some “flat earth” comments. We’re going to force some moderators to accept some “flat earth” comments

          Yup, when I think of tankies I think about the flat earth conspiracy. 🙄

              • tht@social.pwned.page
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                16 hours ago

                One Belives the shape of the earth is a lie, and all governments on earth collaborate to keep the lie alive, the other wants everyone’s needs to be met

                • SoftTeeth@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  12 hours ago

                  Tankies want to put minorities in camps as a distraction from real policy while they give money to rich people.

                  At least that’s what all the politicians they support want.

                  Im sure all their supporters aren’t that malicious, but that’s who they vote for.

          • WrenFeathers@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            This shows you clearly don’t understand what was implied by what was said. “Flat earth” is a placeholder term to imply “random nonsense conspiracy theory.” Nothing more.

            The idea is that instead of instant removal/ban, we are encouraged to debate and draw out through discussion, the reason why it’s bullshit.

            I’ll agree that the change suggested is a bit confusing in it’s wording, but simultaneously, it was also misinterpreted by knee-jerk reactionaries to mean what they needed it to mean to result in the outrage they crave.

            • Pandantic [they/them]@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              12 hours ago

              I agree with this, as long as lines are drawn at the kind of conspiracy theories of “homosexuality is a mental illness”, and the like. I want to make a point that this would pertain to memes as well.

              This is the time to draw clear lines, because we are deciding the tone/direction of one of the largest instance in Lemmy.

              With the timing being suspiciously close to Meta’s clearly bigoted “relaxation” of the mod rules, this brings with it a bad feel, but let’s remember, the fediverse is just growing and taking shape, so this was inevitable (and many of us have been watching it unfold). But we have to remember that we shape it, unlike the corporate shit we left. Make your voices heard.

              Edit:

              I agree with this, as long as lines are drawn at the kind of conspiracy theories of “migrants are ruining our country homosexuality is a mental illness”, and the like. I want to make a point that this would pertain to memes as well.

              I made this change because I believe banning things that are subjective quashes debate.

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              12 hours ago

              What I understand is the new rules are to force us to deal with random nonsense conspiracy theories. We are encouraged to have drawn out discussions with concern trolls who should just get banned. Do you have any idea how long a troll can draw out a discussion while still remaining polite? It’s fun for them to make us patiently explain to them that the Earth is round.

              • WrenFeathers@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                12 hours ago

                You’re not being encouraged to have drawn out discussions with trolls. WE (mods) are encouraged to not insta-ban or knee-jerk remove content just because it might lie within a grey area of what we consider trolling, like other instances do from time to time. If someone is blatantly trolling, which is usually obvious- we remove the content, but if not and it’s just an unpopular opinion/conspiracy theory, the idea is that it should remain and be debated with facts and shut down via discourse rather than a heavy hand.

                Also… This is not an all encompassing be-all-end-all rule. It’s nuanced. VERY nuanced. Again, no one is forcing you to have to deal with nonsense. You also have the option to not react to people you believe is trolling in bad faith, and report them if you feel they are brewing the rules.

                Hope this clears some of it up.

                • Pandantic [they/them]@midwest.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  You also have the option to not react to people you believe is trolling in bad faith, and report them if you feel they are brewing the rules.

                  Leaving more power in the user’s control- you decide a user is a troll and the mods don’t see it that way, you block them and anyone who does want to see them has the option.

        • john89@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Yeah, this proves my point.

          I’m not a tankie, nor am I a right-winger.

      • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        To be honest for people who didn’t use redet a lot, ‘subs’ is very confusing because it doesn’t relate to anything in the Threadyverse.

          • Poik@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            These days? Definitely made sense to me even back when I redditted. I am submissive to catsbeingjerks, hmmm, and Noita.

        • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          2 days ago

          The term “podcast” was coined by Ben Hammersley, a BBC journalist and The Guardian columnist, in February 2004. The word is a combination of “iPod” and “broadcast”. Hammersley first used the term in an article for The Guardian.

          • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Like seriously what would be the connection if it wasn’t the iPod?

            Yeah, “pod” cast, like podracing, you know star wars? Like your car is a pod. So like you cast it directly to your car and it’s like podracing cast pod.

    • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      41
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Not that it matters, the whole .world instance is a toxic disinformation hub that should have been defederated long ago by every sane instance, but from what I’ve read it wasn’t tankies, in this case, it was vegan fundamentalists going on a ban spree (it’s far from the first time their .world community causes drama).

        • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Vegan fundamentalists.

          Veganism is a perfectly cromulent diet choice as long as you take care to supplement any vitamins and aminoacids your diet may lack and you don’t force it on growing children or obligate carnivore pets.

          The problem with the mods in .world’s vegan community, is that they don’t treat it as a personal diet choice, but as a cult. And their view of “heretics” seems directly inspired by Warhammer 40,000.

        • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          I don’t have a .world account. I’m commenting on lemmynsfw, which hasn’t defederated .world yet, so I got this question on my feed and my replies are getting sent back to .world through federation.

          • I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Ya bud, I understand federation. I’m just saying, you’ve commented about how much you hate .world in this thread six times, which is a lot of times, and 99% of your interactions are on .world. It’s incredibly easy to block an instance and never see it again.

                • leftzero@lemmynsfw.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  People are free to make an account on .world of they want to.

                  But that doesn’t mean that cancers like .world or .ml shouldn’t be excised before they kill the rest of the fediverse. Disinformation should never be tolerated.